Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Monday, December 3, 2007

Hanging it out!

Hanging It Out

Request: "I second the motion for a new topic regarding injustices, please Mr. Blog Master hear us out!!" No names please or post will be removed. Keep it simple if you can. This post has been paraphrased.

In reference to a post where someone asked the people of LLNL to take their lickings and keep on ticking I have to say this. Before we being to you ask people to grow up and take responsibility for their own actions and to “go with the flow in the face of every changing times”, we need LLNS to resolve a few issues first.

Lets talk about the injustice NNSA / DOE / LLNS have bestowed upon the people of LLNL throughout the years all of which many of us thought would be resolve within the first week of the take over by LLNS but to our disappointment nothing that LLNS has done has been to the benefit of the employee. It’s been all about “them”, who clearly display’s a “me, me, me” syndrome. I'll try to outline a few facts and keep it as simple if possible.

First of all I’d like to point out that LLNL management does have a choice on how to handle downsizing and cost cutting but as you can see they’ve failed miserably with their poor decision making and clearly practice assured survival of the management tactics. Now is the time for LLNS to make some changes that will impress the congress and senate, but before that can occur LLNS must first clean up the existing dilemma's that lie before us, before anyone will give them a dime for WFO. So the question that remains is, where should LLNS start. Let’s try this.

A large quantity of employees have learned how manipulated the system to acquire big pay raises and advancements and shortly afterwards went into cruise mode for the remainder of their career. I'm talking about those who were technicians at one time and then became supervisors. Once they made the transition they remained in their supervisor’s capacity for approximately five years; where at that time they rose to the top. After a short period of time as a supervisor they reverted back to their technician’s status, yet retained their supervisor’s pay.....

Then we have professional PhD who couldn't make it as experimentalist in the lab, did absolutely nothing for the good of science or the world and yet were consequently advanced to management positions where their salaries quadrupled over their Phd counterparts who by the way consistently could out perform the administrators many times over....

In conclusion my feelings are that LLNS can do better job. However, before this can happen LLNS must be willing to divorce themselves from the good old boy club and start kicking some ass in order to bring LLNL cost down. However I want to make it very clear. The problem is "AT THE TOP", not the "BOTTOM". It’s the worker bees that make things happen at LLNL_NOT_ the administrators. IMHO, people are not expendable commodities, but projects are. This philosophy is a complete contradiction to some, such as ( a manager ) who said “ I want that $2M dollars for projects, not people on the EBA list”, but then again if you examine where he is in the food chain you'd understand why. In managements case, it’s all about “them” and they are convinced that without them the world would cease to function. Bah Humbug Bubba. It’s layers of management that are expendable and should be the first to go.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Witness the 1 million LLNS has offered to the home campaign while laying off 500 workers.

Anonymous said...

December 4, 2007 5:56 PM

We know that cost at least two to three people their jobs. It's all good. I think what you'll find is most of this is now done for tax write off purposes for ULM.

Anonymous said...

that's true 4:44 . And what of our raises? They could have just as easily dipped into their coffers and given us a raise and deducted that as a business expense. If this is any indication of what we can expect from LLNS then I would submit we are in very deep trouble.

They have successfully driven morale into the basement with this ill conceived "charitable donation".

Anonymous said...

one more thing. I would argue the 500 who just lost their job within weeks of Christmas are the most deserving of a "charitable contribution". Can you imagine how they must feel?

It is mind boggling!htbnyiha

Anonymous said...

I am so happy the LLNL blog is back. I never felt comfortable asking even simple questions on the LANL blog without fear of being called some crude, juvenile name. From what I can discern most of the bloggers including Gus are bottom-feeders. Sorry for the regression.

Anonymous said...

Let's see, how many of the LLNS decision makers (say Group Leader to Lab Director) are new to LLNL . . . Hmmmm, oh my God! It is the same old team with a new logo! Now wonder we don't see any positive changes.

Anonymous said...

LLNS hasn't passed $20 million plus in health care costs along to us. Yet anyway. I don't understand the angst over the charity thing. It's out of their fee, it's going to help a lot of causes all of us care about and it gives them a tax write off.

They deserve criticism for many things, this is not one of them.

Anonymous said...

"They deserve criticism for many things, this is not one of them."

Sorry, I don't agree with you there. Giving money to the community (to look good) as they throw people out the back door is ..well.. inhuman.

It is a complete slap in the face to the people who will be losing their houses, and some their families, from this well-concealed Christmas-time RIF.

Anonymous said...

Yep when I looked at the 17 pages of ULM what I saw was the new boss is the same as the old boss except they got big pay raises and bouns checks for doing nothing. However, one must realized that these people are just puppets and it's NNSA DOE Congress and the Senate that are doing this.Even so is doesn't justify the qty of management this place has nor their salaries. So yes, it's the same old boss

Anonymous said...

You mean this 17 pages of management here. Do take note that we now have more than we had before and these people cost money. Big money to the projects which are going away which in the end means the workers will go away, but we're saying money. I can't see how but they've convinced someone. Oh I know. I forgot. The objective was to get everyone off the pension plan which saves trillions of dollars. There you go. The underline root of all evil and the major reason for the transition.

Anonymous said...

Well, as one working in the trenches and seeing many friends/co-workers receive there notices the common question is Why don't they just tell us the day they plan to let us go?
I cannot believe they aren't doing this.You at least get this much from outside employers.
Morale here is in the crapper.

Anonymous said...

4:52,

I posted it elsewhere, but in our area (by someone who is helping organize the whole thing), we were told the notices would start going out on 1/7/08. The majority of them will go out that day with stragglers for 2 weeks after that. All the notifications have to be completed within a 2 week period by law. That's not quite 60 days from the announcement though, so not sure how they came up with that date.

Anonymous said...

December 6, 2007 1:56 AM, the point you seem to miss is this is money they collect as part of the management fee. It is not lab money. They are a private company. What they are doing is sensible, logical and positive.

I hate this whole transition as much as anyone but I refuse to lose my sense of perspective and fair play.

Anonymous said...

December 6, 2007 6:57 AM,

Maybe you are right, but let me put an analogy out there for you so you can try to see what perspective I am coming from.

Lets say your significant other tells you there is no money this year in your shared account, so she will be unable to get you any christmas gifts this year, and asks you to be understanding. Your neighbors then come over and thank you for the 1000$ each they received from your s.o. to help them with christmas gifts. She says that you should be happy about that, because it was her separate account, not the joint one.
You then try to talk about it at work, and your coworkers tell you "What she did is sensible, logical and positive"

On another note, The private company excuse just doesnt work for me, sorry. A real private company puts the extra money back in the corporation, though employee incentives, training, capital investment, etc. LANLS just takes the money and runs. They are not a real private company IMHO, they are just a front company set up to take money from the taxpayers and retire rich.

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days